Klamath Agreements Benefit Local and Regional Economies
Investing in Solutions
The Klamath (salmon) Management Zone stretches over 400 miles from Coos Bay Oregon to Monterrey Bay California. In several recent years, commercial and sport salmon fishing has been restricted or entirely halted due to poor runs of Klamath salmon. TIn response to these fishing closures, federal and state governments have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in disaster relief. The Klamath Agreements aim to reverse this trend by investing in real solutions that will end the Klamath Crisis.
Jobs for Struggling Rural Economies
The Klamath Agreements would fund dam deconstruction, river restoration, and improvements in agricultural infrastructure that together represent an investment of nearly $1 billion in Siskiyou County California and Klamath County Oregon – areas with unemployment rates over 15%. Each dollar spent in the construction industry in California cycles through local economies 2.35 times. This means that if $1 billion is spent on dam removal , habitat restoration, and improvements to agricultural infrastructure, it would provide over a $2.3 billion boost to the local economy.
After dam removal, economic benefits will remain. Consider that each fish caught by a recreational fishermen is worth $200 to the local economy. If the number of fish caught were simply doubled, it would be worth over $4.4 million annually. Doubling the number of fish in the river would also create 71 permanent jobs directly related to the fishery; 48 in recreational industry, 24 in commercial industry. Currently PacifiCorp employs only 18 people to operate the dams.
Financing the Agreements
The KHSA provides a total of $450 million for purposes of dam removal: $200 million from PacifiCorp’s ratepayers, $250 million from California. The primary source of California's funding would be through the pending water bond.
The KBRA reallocates $450 million in existing funding for newly prioritized restoration activities and calls for an additional $450 in congressional appropriations over the next 10 years.
If for any reason there are budgetary shortfalls in funding dam removal, the Agreements require settlement parties to meet and confer in order to solve the impasse.
- Economic Impact of the Klamath Settlement Agreements by David Gallo, Ph.D., University of California (October 2011)
- Economic Modeling of Relicensing and Decommissioning Options for the Klamath Basin Hydroelectric Project (California Energy Commission Report) (Nov. 2006)
- Addendum to California Energy Commission Report
- FERC Final EIS Economic Analysis (Nov. 2007)
- FERC Esitmates of DamRemoval Costs (Nov. 2007)
- Economic Impacts of the Klamath Settlement Agreements (Oct. 2010)
 A job is defined as full time employment for one year.